Provocative title I suppose.
Well, not chock full o’ mercury, no. But many popular types of fish do have a significant quantity of mercury.
Tuna Fish.
And what a shame too. Tuna fish was one of my favorite lunches when I was a kid. Confession: with plenty of unhealthy mayonnaise.
When I eat fish now, as often as every few days, I eat it plain. Nearly plain that is, just with a wee bit of salt. And it is delicious.
My preference would be to eat less fish and more vegetables, but I have learned, by experimenting, that I am at my best and feel my best if I make sure to eat a fair amount of high protein foods. I suppose that means I am a protein type.
Anyway, I eat veggies and I eat one kind of fish that has been tested for mercury. The mercury levels are so low that, as my chemical engineering friend says “it nearly amounts to nothing”. I probably get more from walking down the street a few blocks than I do from eating this particular Salmon.
Back to the question: Are Fish Full of Mercury?
The short answer is no. But we ought to ask another question after we answer this one…
Fresh or Frozen Tuna Fish contains 0.38 ppm of mercury on average
Canned Tuna Fish contains 0.20 ppm mercury on average
Swordfish and Shark contain much higher levels.
So, perhaps the average person doesn’t have to be overly paranoid about mercury levels in the average fish. However, some folks are more sensitive than others, I being one of them.
So, while I do eat fish, I am highly selective about which type and from where I get it.
The other question, we should probably ask is: Just How Much Mercury Do You Want In Your Body Anyway?
That will be good for another post.
If you want to know what fish I eat, it is Wild Alaska Sockeye Salmon. If you want to know where I get it, click here and you can help support my blog and if you do, thank you very much.
1 Mercury levels came from http://www.fda.gov/fdac/reprints/mercury.html